Performance in Multi-Joint Force-Plate Assessments in Male and Female CrossFit<sup>®</sup> Athletes
Background: CrossFit<sup>®</sup> aims to be equitable between both males and female athletes, supporting equal representation and equal prize money at international events. However, to date, limited information is known on CrossFit<sup>®</sup> athletes’ performance in the cou...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Biomechanics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7078/5/2/35 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: CrossFit<sup>®</sup> aims to be equitable between both males and female athletes, supporting equal representation and equal prize money at international events. However, to date, limited information is known on CrossFit<sup>®</sup> athletes’ performance in the countermovement jump (CMJ), countermovement rebound jump (CMR-J), and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) when assessed using force plates, and if there are any differences between sexes. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to observe whether any sex-based differences and relationships exist between performance within these assessments. Methods: A total of CrossFit athletes (43 male = 32.8 ± 9.0 years; height 1.78 ± 0.06 m; mass = 92.4 ± 10.6 kg; and 31 female = 31.0 ± 7.6 years, height = 1.64 ± 0.05 m; mass = 68.8 ± 6.0 kg) completed three trials of CMJ, CMR-J and IMTP using portable dual-system force-plate sampling at 1000 Hz. Results: Moderate–large relationships were observed between CMJ, CMR-J and IMTP outcome measures (<i>r</i> = 0.396–0.809, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Males demonstrated small to moderately greater performance outcomes than females for CMJ height (males = 0.35 ± 0.08 m; females 0.30 ± 0.06 m, <i>d</i> = 0.73), CMR-J height (males = 0.32 ± 0.08 m; females = 0.30 ± 0.06 m, <i>d</i> = 0.39) and IMTP peak net force (males = 30.62 ± 10.01 N·kg<sup>−1</sup>; females = 27.49 ± 6.44 N·kg<sup>−1</sup>, <i>d</i> = 0.29). Conclusions: Maximal relative strength in CrossFit<sup>®</sup> athletes should be seen as imperative in both male and female athletes due to the meaningful relationship in ballistic and plyometric ability. Moreover, previous relationships with CrossFit<sup>®</sup> performance and the injury risk reduction benefits of improving strength provide further support. The descriptive data presented could be used by CrossFit<sup>®</sup> coaches to assess and compare the current performance of their own athletes in a battery of tests examining CMJ, CMR-J and IMTP, while also facilitating decisions upon prescription within training and competition. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2673-7078 |