Prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with different types of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer.<h4>Methods</h4...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Zapisane w:
Opis bibliograficzny
Główni autorzy: Jinjia Chang, Xinyang Liu, Shanshan Wang, Zhe Zhang, Zheng Wu, Xiaowei Zhang, Jin Li
Format: Artykuł
Język:angielski
Wydane: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Seria:PLoS ONE
Dostęp online:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105524
Etykiety: Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!
Opis
Streszczenie:<h4>Background</h4>Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>A search of several databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, was conducted to identify studies examining the association between FGFR gene amplification and cancer. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, and overall incidence rates, hazard risk (HR), overall survival, disease-free survival, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies.<h4>Results</h4>In the meta-analysis of 24 studies, the prevalence of FGFR gene amplification was FGFR1: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08-0.13) and FGFR2: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02-0.06). Overall survival was significantly worse among patients with FGFR gene amplification: FGFR1 [HR 1.57 (95% CI: 1.23-1.99); p = 0.0002] and FGFR2 [HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.73-3.00); p<0.00001].<h4>Conclusions</h4>Current evidence supports the conclusion that the outcomes of patients with FGFR gene amplified cancers is worse than for those with non-FGFR gene amplified cancers.
ISSN:1932-6203