Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys

Purpose: Gender diversity in academic radiation oncology (RO) has become a topic of interest in recent years, with studies showing that practicing female academic radiation oncologists (AROs) are outnumbered by male colleagues at a rate of approximately 3:1. Gender differences are also observed in s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Doyle, MS, Neha Vapiwala, MD, FACR, FASTRO, FASCO, Mutlay Sayan, MD, Miranda Lam, MD, MBA, Shalini Moningi, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-09-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425001356
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839614187205033984
author Patrick Doyle, MS
Neha Vapiwala, MD, FACR, FASTRO, FASCO
Mutlay Sayan, MD
Miranda Lam, MD, MBA
Shalini Moningi, MD
author_facet Patrick Doyle, MS
Neha Vapiwala, MD, FACR, FASTRO, FASCO
Mutlay Sayan, MD
Miranda Lam, MD, MBA
Shalini Moningi, MD
author_sort Patrick Doyle, MS
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Gender diversity in academic radiation oncology (RO) has become a topic of interest in recent years, with studies showing that practicing female academic radiation oncologists (AROs) are outnumbered by male colleagues at a rate of approximately 3:1. Gender differences are also observed in subspecialties whose patient populations are overwhelmingly of a single gender, such as genitourinary (GU) and gynecologic (GYN) RO. We aimed to investigate whether challenges exist for academic RO physicians who primarily treat patients of another gender, and, if so, what barriers they face in practice. Methods and Materials: We conducted 2 national surveys of female GU academic RO physicians and male GYN academic RO physicians working at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited academic centers. Survey questions focused on career path, challenges faced, and barriers to practicing GU or GYN oncology. Results: A total of 13/42 (30.2%) GU survey recipients responded as treating GU oncology and 31/77 (40.3%) GYN survey recipients responded as treating GYN oncology. Of these respondents, 9 GU and 3 GYN physicians reported facing challenges as an academic RO faculty member because of their gender identity, and 5 GU and 4 GYN physicians reported that their subspecialty specifically presented challenges. Neither group commonly reported difficulties developing trust and rapport with patients. In the GU academic RO group, reports of challenging relationships with other professional colleagues were common. Difficulties finding or serving as a mentor were also common in both groups. Conclusions: Female GU AROs and male GYN AROs may face unique challenges. Identifying and understanding these challenges directly from practicing physicians are important steps in improving professional success, career satisfaction, and clinical care quality.
format Article
id doaj-art-0ad7affb74dd4c6d82cebac2c49e3fd8
institution Matheson Library
issn 2452-1094
language English
publishDate 2025-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj-art-0ad7affb74dd4c6d82cebac2c49e3fd82025-07-26T05:23:36ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942025-09-01109101848Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide SurveysPatrick Doyle, MS0Neha Vapiwala, MD, FACR, FASTRO, FASCO1Mutlay Sayan, MD2Miranda Lam, MD, MBA3Shalini Moningi, MD4Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Corresponding author: Patrick Doyle, MSDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MassachusettsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MassachusettsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital / Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MassachusettsPurpose: Gender diversity in academic radiation oncology (RO) has become a topic of interest in recent years, with studies showing that practicing female academic radiation oncologists (AROs) are outnumbered by male colleagues at a rate of approximately 3:1. Gender differences are also observed in subspecialties whose patient populations are overwhelmingly of a single gender, such as genitourinary (GU) and gynecologic (GYN) RO. We aimed to investigate whether challenges exist for academic RO physicians who primarily treat patients of another gender, and, if so, what barriers they face in practice. Methods and Materials: We conducted 2 national surveys of female GU academic RO physicians and male GYN academic RO physicians working at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited academic centers. Survey questions focused on career path, challenges faced, and barriers to practicing GU or GYN oncology. Results: A total of 13/42 (30.2%) GU survey recipients responded as treating GU oncology and 31/77 (40.3%) GYN survey recipients responded as treating GYN oncology. Of these respondents, 9 GU and 3 GYN physicians reported facing challenges as an academic RO faculty member because of their gender identity, and 5 GU and 4 GYN physicians reported that their subspecialty specifically presented challenges. Neither group commonly reported difficulties developing trust and rapport with patients. In the GU academic RO group, reports of challenging relationships with other professional colleagues were common. Difficulties finding or serving as a mentor were also common in both groups. Conclusions: Female GU AROs and male GYN AROs may face unique challenges. Identifying and understanding these challenges directly from practicing physicians are important steps in improving professional success, career satisfaction, and clinical care quality.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425001356
spellingShingle Patrick Doyle, MS
Neha Vapiwala, MD, FACR, FASTRO, FASCO
Mutlay Sayan, MD
Miranda Lam, MD, MBA
Shalini Moningi, MD
Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys
title_full Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys
title_fullStr Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys
title_short Examining Barriers to Practice in Genitourinary and Gynecologic Radiation Oncology: Results from 2 Nationwide Surveys
title_sort examining barriers to practice in genitourinary and gynecologic radiation oncology results from 2 nationwide surveys
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425001356
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickdoylems examiningbarrierstopracticeingenitourinaryandgynecologicradiationoncologyresultsfrom2nationwidesurveys
AT nehavapiwalamdfacrfastrofasco examiningbarrierstopracticeingenitourinaryandgynecologicradiationoncologyresultsfrom2nationwidesurveys
AT mutlaysayanmd examiningbarrierstopracticeingenitourinaryandgynecologicradiationoncologyresultsfrom2nationwidesurveys
AT mirandalammdmba examiningbarrierstopracticeingenitourinaryandgynecologicradiationoncologyresultsfrom2nationwidesurveys
AT shalinimoningimd examiningbarrierstopracticeingenitourinaryandgynecologicradiationoncologyresultsfrom2nationwidesurveys