Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals.
<h4>Background</h4>Selective outcome reporting is a significant methodological concern. Comparisons between the outcomes reported in clinical trial registrations and those later published allow investigators to understand the extent of selection bias among trialists. We examined the poss...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Benjamin Howard, Jared T Scott, Mark Blubaugh, Brie Roepke, Caleb Scheckel, Matt Vassar |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180986&type=printable |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review.
by: Cole Wayant, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Shoulder Arthroplasty Trials Are Infrequently Registered: A Systematic Review of Trials.
by: Matthew Thomas Sims, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
by: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Clinical Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With Functional Neurological Disorders
by: Raka Maitra, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Gaps in diversity and inclusion reporting in United States knee injury clinical trials: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
by: Faith Hendrickson, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)