Model Validation and Sensitivity Analysis of Coupled Non‐Equilibrium Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media With Application to Evaporation From Bare Soils
Abstract Mathematical models in engineering play an important role in understanding and predicting the behavior of a system. A mechanistic coupled liquid water, water vapor and heat transfer model incorporating kinetic phase change accounting for real‐time interfacial area between water and gas phas...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Water Resources Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035573 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Mathematical models in engineering play an important role in understanding and predicting the behavior of a system. A mechanistic coupled liquid water, water vapor and heat transfer model incorporating kinetic phase change accounting for real‐time interfacial area between water and gas phases was developed to predict coupled subsurface processes and evaporation (drying) rates from bare soils. To enhance the model capability to predict evaporation rates, the air resistance associated with the viscous sublayer was implemented in energy and mass exchange across the soil‐air interface (the land‐atmosphere boundary condition [BC]). The atmospheric stability condition was also considered in the calculation of sensible heat and vapor fluxes at the ground surface. This comprehensive model was validated against measured field data from bare soil test plots from a green roof study, during temperate summer conditions in Canada, demonstrating that the model captured the main coupled processes in the subsurface of bare soil during drying periods. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the importance of various components of the comprehensive model. Removal of viscous sublayer resistance in the vapor transfer BC resulted in poorer predictions of evaporation (drying) rates. Incorporating the atmospheric stability function accounting for real‐time atmospheric conditions did not improve the predictive capability for the simulated drying events compared to the case when only a neutral atmospheric condition was implemented. Neglecting heat transfer associated with hydrodynamic dispersion of water vapor in the subsurface had limited impact on subsurface temperature predictions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |