Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview
Berger (1967) argued that the plausibility of a religious worldview depends on the strength of the plausibility structure supporting it. We hypothesize that a weaker religious plausibility structure (or, alternatively, a stronger non-religious plausibility structure) will increase the odds of adopti...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2025-06-01
|
Series: | Secularism and Nonreligion |
Online Access: | https://account.secularismandnonreligion.org/index.php/up-j-sn/article/view/200 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1839624796902522880 |
---|---|
author | Katie E. Corcoran Christopher P. Scheitle |
author_facet | Katie E. Corcoran Christopher P. Scheitle |
author_sort | Katie E. Corcoran |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Berger (1967) argued that the plausibility of a religious worldview depends on the strength of the plausibility structure supporting it. We hypothesize that a weaker religious plausibility structure (or, alternatively, a stronger non-religious plausibility structure) will increase the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. We use waves 2 and 4 of the National Study of Youth and Religion to test the relationship between non-religious and religious friendship ties and adopting an atheistic worldview in the United States. We find that a stronger non-religious plausibility structure, regardless of how it is operationalized (e.g., percent, majority, or entirety of one’s friendship network who are not religious), is significantly associated with increased odds of adopting an atheistic worldview as an emerging adult. Even having one friend who is not religious among mostly religious friends may potentially serve for some to relativize one’s religious worldview thereby increasing the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. Still, regardless of one’s friendship network’s composition, maintaining a non-atheistic worldview is more common than adopting an atheistic worldview suggesting that worldviews may not be as fragile as some prior research has suggested. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-040d69cac37f4e2d9ea1330212d08d03 |
institution | Matheson Library |
issn | 2053-6712 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Secularism and Nonreligion |
spelling | doaj-art-040d69cac37f4e2d9ea1330212d08d032025-07-18T06:59:41ZengUbiquity PressSecularism and Nonreligion2053-67122025-06-01144410.5334/snr.200196Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic WorldviewKatie E. Corcoran0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7948-5877Christopher P. Scheitle1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-4133West Virginia UniversityWest Virginia UniversityBerger (1967) argued that the plausibility of a religious worldview depends on the strength of the plausibility structure supporting it. We hypothesize that a weaker religious plausibility structure (or, alternatively, a stronger non-religious plausibility structure) will increase the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. We use waves 2 and 4 of the National Study of Youth and Religion to test the relationship between non-religious and religious friendship ties and adopting an atheistic worldview in the United States. We find that a stronger non-religious plausibility structure, regardless of how it is operationalized (e.g., percent, majority, or entirety of one’s friendship network who are not religious), is significantly associated with increased odds of adopting an atheistic worldview as an emerging adult. Even having one friend who is not religious among mostly religious friends may potentially serve for some to relativize one’s religious worldview thereby increasing the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. Still, regardless of one’s friendship network’s composition, maintaining a non-atheistic worldview is more common than adopting an atheistic worldview suggesting that worldviews may not be as fragile as some prior research has suggested.https://account.secularismandnonreligion.org/index.php/up-j-sn/article/view/200 |
spellingShingle | Katie E. Corcoran Christopher P. Scheitle Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview Secularism and Nonreligion |
title | Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview |
title_full | Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview |
title_fullStr | Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview |
title_full_unstemmed | Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview |
title_short | Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview |
title_sort | holes in sacred umbrellas non religious friendship networks and adopting an atheistic worldview |
url | https://account.secularismandnonreligion.org/index.php/up-j-sn/article/view/200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katieecorcoran holesinsacredumbrellasnonreligiousfriendshipnetworksandadoptinganatheisticworldview AT christopherpscheitle holesinsacredumbrellasnonreligiousfriendshipnetworksandadoptinganatheisticworldview |