Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview

Berger (1967) argued that the plausibility of a religious worldview depends on the strength of the plausibility structure supporting it. We hypothesize that a weaker religious plausibility structure (or, alternatively, a stronger non-religious plausibility structure) will increase the odds of adopti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katie E. Corcoran, Christopher P. Scheitle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2025-06-01
Series:Secularism and Nonreligion
Online Access:https://account.secularismandnonreligion.org/index.php/up-j-sn/article/view/200
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839624796902522880
author Katie E. Corcoran
Christopher P. Scheitle
author_facet Katie E. Corcoran
Christopher P. Scheitle
author_sort Katie E. Corcoran
collection DOAJ
description Berger (1967) argued that the plausibility of a religious worldview depends on the strength of the plausibility structure supporting it. We hypothesize that a weaker religious plausibility structure (or, alternatively, a stronger non-religious plausibility structure) will increase the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. We use waves 2 and 4 of the National Study of Youth and Religion to test the relationship between non-religious and religious friendship ties and adopting an atheistic worldview in the United States. We find that a stronger non-religious plausibility structure, regardless of how it is operationalized (e.g., percent, majority, or entirety of one’s friendship network who are not religious), is significantly associated with increased odds of adopting an atheistic worldview as an emerging adult. Even having one friend who is not religious among mostly religious friends may potentially serve for some to relativize one’s religious worldview thereby increasing the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. Still, regardless of one’s friendship network’s composition, maintaining a non-atheistic worldview is more common than adopting an atheistic worldview suggesting that worldviews may not be as fragile as some prior research has suggested.
format Article
id doaj-art-040d69cac37f4e2d9ea1330212d08d03
institution Matheson Library
issn 2053-6712
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Secularism and Nonreligion
spelling doaj-art-040d69cac37f4e2d9ea1330212d08d032025-07-18T06:59:41ZengUbiquity PressSecularism and Nonreligion2053-67122025-06-01144410.5334/snr.200196Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic WorldviewKatie E. Corcoran0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7948-5877Christopher P. Scheitle1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-4133West Virginia UniversityWest Virginia UniversityBerger (1967) argued that the plausibility of a religious worldview depends on the strength of the plausibility structure supporting it. We hypothesize that a weaker religious plausibility structure (or, alternatively, a stronger non-religious plausibility structure) will increase the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. We use waves 2 and 4 of the National Study of Youth and Religion to test the relationship between non-religious and religious friendship ties and adopting an atheistic worldview in the United States. We find that a stronger non-religious plausibility structure, regardless of how it is operationalized (e.g., percent, majority, or entirety of one’s friendship network who are not religious), is significantly associated with increased odds of adopting an atheistic worldview as an emerging adult. Even having one friend who is not religious among mostly religious friends may potentially serve for some to relativize one’s religious worldview thereby increasing the odds of adopting an atheistic worldview. Still, regardless of one’s friendship network’s composition, maintaining a non-atheistic worldview is more common than adopting an atheistic worldview suggesting that worldviews may not be as fragile as some prior research has suggested.https://account.secularismandnonreligion.org/index.php/up-j-sn/article/view/200
spellingShingle Katie E. Corcoran
Christopher P. Scheitle
Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview
Secularism and Nonreligion
title Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview
title_full Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview
title_fullStr Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview
title_full_unstemmed Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview
title_short Holes in Sacred Umbrellas: Non-Religious Friendship Networks and Adopting an Atheistic Worldview
title_sort holes in sacred umbrellas non religious friendship networks and adopting an atheistic worldview
url https://account.secularismandnonreligion.org/index.php/up-j-sn/article/view/200
work_keys_str_mv AT katieecorcoran holesinsacredumbrellasnonreligiousfriendshipnetworksandadoptinganatheisticworldview
AT christopherpscheitle holesinsacredumbrellasnonreligiousfriendshipnetworksandadoptinganatheisticworldview