Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” technique

Introduction: Breast implantation combined with mastopexy is challenging, not only because a standard procedure is lacking, but also because of the high potential for complications, including a high rate of post-surgical revision. Originally intended for primary mastopexy and inclusion of silicone i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Carlos Sánchez López, Patrícia Erazo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2018-09-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/2163/en_v33n3a09.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839605151332040704
author Juan Carlos Sánchez López
Patrícia Erazo
author_facet Juan Carlos Sánchez López
Patrícia Erazo
author_sort Juan Carlos Sánchez López
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Breast implantation combined with mastopexy is challenging, not only because a standard procedure is lacking, but also because of the high potential for complications, including a high rate of post-surgical revision. Originally intended for primary mastopexy and inclusion of silicone implants in hypoplastic breasts with moderate to severe ptosis, the use of the mirror "D" technique is now extended to treatment of ptosis recurrence with displacement of prostheses, with or without capsular contracture and/or unsightly scars. Method: The procedure described was performed in 90 patients, using specific marking to determine block resection of skin and underlying parenchyma for symmetrization. The procedure included use of a medial pedicle flap and exchange of original implants for textured, high-profile, round silicone prostheses with equal volumes bilaterally and positioned in the submuscular plane, resulting in a final vertical scar. Results: No surgical revision was required in any of the cases. There was no occurrence of postoperative infection or necrosis of the nipple-areola complex or scar. The average parenchyma resection was 80 g. Eighty-nine patients (98.8%) were submitted to resection of different volumes. The average prosthesis volume was 300 mL. The length of the vertical scar was stable with an average of 6.5 cm after 2 years. The results were considered satisfactory according to patient assessment. Conclusion: Secondary mastopexy is a more complex surgery due to severe atrophy of the tissue as a result of previous surgery. Its benefits include improved symmetrization, thinner scars and reduction in tension on the nipple-areola complex, long-lasting results, and a high degree of patient satisfaction.
format Article
id doaj-art-033f145b9e9d4beb8b8d30f6ccde1d1b
institution Matheson Library
issn 1983-5175
2177-1235
language English
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica
spelling doaj-art-033f145b9e9d4beb8b8d30f6ccde1d1b2025-08-02T00:22:29ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica1983-51752177-12352018-09-01330332433210.5935/2177-1235.2018RBCP0145Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” techniqueJuan Carlos Sánchez López0Patrícia Erazo1Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, São Paulo, SP, BrazilSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, São Paulo, SP, BrazilIntroduction: Breast implantation combined with mastopexy is challenging, not only because a standard procedure is lacking, but also because of the high potential for complications, including a high rate of post-surgical revision. Originally intended for primary mastopexy and inclusion of silicone implants in hypoplastic breasts with moderate to severe ptosis, the use of the mirror "D" technique is now extended to treatment of ptosis recurrence with displacement of prostheses, with or without capsular contracture and/or unsightly scars. Method: The procedure described was performed in 90 patients, using specific marking to determine block resection of skin and underlying parenchyma for symmetrization. The procedure included use of a medial pedicle flap and exchange of original implants for textured, high-profile, round silicone prostheses with equal volumes bilaterally and positioned in the submuscular plane, resulting in a final vertical scar. Results: No surgical revision was required in any of the cases. There was no occurrence of postoperative infection or necrosis of the nipple-areola complex or scar. The average parenchyma resection was 80 g. Eighty-nine patients (98.8%) were submitted to resection of different volumes. The average prosthesis volume was 300 mL. The length of the vertical scar was stable with an average of 6.5 cm after 2 years. The results were considered satisfactory according to patient assessment. Conclusion: Secondary mastopexy is a more complex surgery due to severe atrophy of the tissue as a result of previous surgery. Its benefits include improved symmetrization, thinner scars and reduction in tension on the nipple-areola complex, long-lasting results, and a high degree of patient satisfaction.http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/2163/en_v33n3a09.pdfbreast implantsmammoplastyatrophysecondary preventionreconstructive surgical procedures
spellingShingle Juan Carlos Sánchez López
Patrícia Erazo
Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” technique
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica
breast implants
mammoplasty
atrophy
secondary prevention
reconstructive surgical procedures
title Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” technique
title_full Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” technique
title_fullStr Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” technique
title_full_unstemmed Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” technique
title_short Secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis: mirror “D” technique
title_sort secondary mastopexy with exchange of prosthesis mirror d technique
topic breast implants
mammoplasty
atrophy
secondary prevention
reconstructive surgical procedures
url http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/2163/en_v33n3a09.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT juancarlossanchezlopez secondarymastopexywithexchangeofprosthesismirrordtechnique
AT patriciaerazo secondarymastopexywithexchangeofprosthesismirrordtechnique