Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.

The clinical use of genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk is expanding, and thus understanding how determinants of cancer susceptibility identified in one population can be applied to another is of growing importance. However there is considerable debate on the relevance of ethnic backg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lijun Jing, Li Su, Brian Z Ring
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097522
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1839609858888826880
author Lijun Jing
Li Su
Brian Z Ring
author_facet Lijun Jing
Li Su
Brian Z Ring
author_sort Lijun Jing
collection DOAJ
description The clinical use of genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk is expanding, and thus understanding how determinants of cancer susceptibility identified in one population can be applied to another is of growing importance. However there is considerable debate on the relevance of ethnic background in clinical genetics, reflecting both the significance and complexity of genetic heritage. We address this via a systematic review of reported associations with cancer risk for 82 markers in 68 studies across six different cancer types, comparing association results between ethnic groups and examining linkage disequilibrium between risk alleles and nearby genetic loci. We find that the relevance of ethnic background depends on the question. If asked whether the association of variants with disease risk is conserved across ethnic boundaries, we find that the answer is yes, the majority of markers show insignificant variability in association with cancer risk across ethnic groups. However if the question is whether a significant association between a variant and cancer risk is likely to reproduce, the answer is no, most markers do not validate in an ethnic group other than the discovery cohort's ancestry. This lack of reproducibility is not attributable to studies being inadequately populated due to low allele frequency in other ethnic groups. Instead, differences in local genomic structure between ethnic groups are associated with the strength of association with cancer risk and therefore confound interpretation of the implied physiologic association tracked by the disease allele. This suggest that a biological association for cancer risk alleles may be broadly consistent across ethnic boundaries, but reproduction of a clinical study in another ethnic group is uncommon, in part due to confounding genomic architecture. As clinical studies are increasingly performed globally this has important implications for how cancer risk stratifiers should be studied and employed.
format Article
id doaj-art-0211a72efac042c89a587e6db8a2a1e4
institution Matheson Library
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-0211a72efac042c89a587e6db8a2a1e42025-07-30T05:31:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e9752210.1371/journal.pone.0097522Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.Lijun JingLi SuBrian Z RingThe clinical use of genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk is expanding, and thus understanding how determinants of cancer susceptibility identified in one population can be applied to another is of growing importance. However there is considerable debate on the relevance of ethnic background in clinical genetics, reflecting both the significance and complexity of genetic heritage. We address this via a systematic review of reported associations with cancer risk for 82 markers in 68 studies across six different cancer types, comparing association results between ethnic groups and examining linkage disequilibrium between risk alleles and nearby genetic loci. We find that the relevance of ethnic background depends on the question. If asked whether the association of variants with disease risk is conserved across ethnic boundaries, we find that the answer is yes, the majority of markers show insignificant variability in association with cancer risk across ethnic groups. However if the question is whether a significant association between a variant and cancer risk is likely to reproduce, the answer is no, most markers do not validate in an ethnic group other than the discovery cohort's ancestry. This lack of reproducibility is not attributable to studies being inadequately populated due to low allele frequency in other ethnic groups. Instead, differences in local genomic structure between ethnic groups are associated with the strength of association with cancer risk and therefore confound interpretation of the implied physiologic association tracked by the disease allele. This suggest that a biological association for cancer risk alleles may be broadly consistent across ethnic boundaries, but reproduction of a clinical study in another ethnic group is uncommon, in part due to confounding genomic architecture. As clinical studies are increasingly performed globally this has important implications for how cancer risk stratifiers should be studied and employed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097522
spellingShingle Lijun Jing
Li Su
Brian Z Ring
Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.
PLoS ONE
title Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.
title_full Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.
title_fullStr Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.
title_short Ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk: a systematic review.
title_sort ethnic background and genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk a systematic review
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097522
work_keys_str_mv AT lijunjing ethnicbackgroundandgeneticvariationintheevaluationofcancerriskasystematicreview
AT lisu ethnicbackgroundandgeneticvariationintheevaluationofcancerriskasystematicreview
AT brianzring ethnicbackgroundandgeneticvariationintheevaluationofcancerriskasystematicreview